Dr Gray on KLIV
A unanimous vote Tuesday by the Santa Clara Valley Water District endorsed a funding plan for the long-anticipated project for the largest city in the country without fluoridated drinking water. But it will take about two more years to finalize the details and retrofit local water plants to bring the additive aimed at saving children’s teeth from decay to the city’s taps.
After much lobbying by the Health Trust of San Jose, and the local dental society, for the first time ever, SCVWD and San Jose water will spend nearly 25 million dollars to fluoridate water to the counties that they serve. Even with a unanimous vote by the Santa Clara Valley Water District this last Monday, San Jose residents won’t be getting the optimal amount of fluoride in their drinking water. While the water district came up with a public-private partnership to fund the $6.6 million to retrofit its three main plants for fluoride over the next two years, its largest customer — San Jose Water Co. — still needs to come up with another $18 million to retrofit dozens of its wells. Until then, San Jose Water customers will only get a diluted amount of fluoride.
With water rates off the chart, and the SCCWD budget in such disarray that they recently passed Proposition B begging for more taxes in light of their misappropriation of existing measure B funds, I don’t think the average voter and taxpayer has weighed the cost benefit of this project. Fluoride does not help everyone who drinks water. The target population that the Health Trust refers to in the Bay Area is primarily served by San Jose Water and there seems to be no plans to effectively evaluate the benefit of this project either.
Fluoride is a great way to prevent dental decay, however there are better ways to target those in need with 18 million dollars. What about taking the 18 million and paying dentist to actually provide care to that specific population? Hello ADA; when public utilities start practicing dentistry, where is the regulation? Flouride is a great and effective drug – but its still a drug administered without informed consent. Here are things to think about as well.
You Might Also Enjoy...
Dr Gray on KLIV
Ten Facts about Fluoride
Here is a copy of a letter submitted to the SCVWD questioning the recent Fluoridation Project that we are now being taxed to fund
I believe topical fluoride is beneficial but I don’t believe that we should forcibly mandate all people to ingest it.
A little Dental Humor from one of our talented patients…
I received a Omega VRT350HD Juicer from my Nutritionist, Cal educated, daughter this Christmas.